Sunday, 15 April 2018

Time Traveler Shows Real Time Machine





Source Indy
Time travel is something that you only thought was possible in sci-fi movies or novels, but low and behold it's actually real (maybe).
At least that's what one man from Slovenia is claiming, who has said that he has travelled to the 45th century, which would be in the fifth millennium and somewhere between the years 4001 and 5000.
The man, who goes only by the name of David, says he is inspired by Nikola Tesla, and spoke to ApexTV about his adventures in time and space. 
He claims that he started building his time machine, which isn't a DeLorean, eight years ago and has met many other time travellers around the globe who helped him construct his device.
One particular man who helped him on his journey was the fantastically named "Jack Lion Cousteau" from France, who had time travelled only 40 times. 
Anyway, after extensive research and consultation, David was able to build the machine that you see below, which looks more like a computer hard drive - but then again we aren't time travellers, so we can hardly critique.
time.jpg
Picture: ApexTV

Speaking to ApexTV, David said: 
During that investigation, I have passed through the whole world. I have found facts.
I met a person who had a wound on the head from a laser weapon. Another person show me a photo from the 35th century.
In France, I even met a person who had made a time machine. He told me that the machine had been made three years ago and during the time he had travelled only 40 times.
David says that the machine can cause a lot of pain to his body and once left him with a wound on his head. 
Another problem is that his machine only allows him to travel into the future, but it has allowed him to witness some pretty startling things. 
He adds:
The first travelling with my machine lasted 20 seconds then I started to prolong the time and I saw many interesting things. 
I even saw the aliens, which lives [sic] inside us. I communicated with the future people.
I too much wanted to bring all the facts but I understand that my invention could bring harm and evil. 
He also says that he saw buildings with more than 500 floors and flying cars, which doesn't seem that inconceivable, especially as Elon Musk can now blast cars into space.
Yet there are inconsistencies in his story as after he says has visited the 45th century, he goes on to add that his machine can only travel to the 38th century. Hmm...
If that's the best that David could come up with, we're prepared to label this story as highly sceptical and about as believable as all those apocalypse stories
That being said, we'll let you make your own mind up. Watch David's full interview in the video below. 





Friday, 13 April 2018

A TIME traveller from the year 2200 has brought food back from the future

A TIME traveller from the year 2200 has brought food back from the future which comes in the form of a tablet and is allegedly given to everyone by the Government, allowing people to live for over 200 years.

W.D. Davis said the food “has everything you need for a week.”
Before adding: “Our government supplies them monthly to everyone.”
W.D. Davis remained anonymous because he said he could have been in danger if he was to reveal his true identity.
Mr Davis, who says he is 103 years old, said the food has all the nutrients you need for a week.
All the food is free in the future according to Mr Davis, which has helped to stop world hunger and plastic pollution.
W.D. Davis claims to be from the year 2200.
Time travel is allegedly going to be commercial in the future, but you have to be very wealthy in order to have access to it.
The time machine according to Mr Davis is “a circle and you walk through it, and enter into another dimension.
“It is like walking through a door.”
In the future, humanity will have the technology to live on other planets such as Mars.
Mr Davis said: ”People are providing their own food such as vegetables.”
W.D. Davis YOUTUBE
W.D. Davis said “our government supplies them monthly to everyone”
He added: “They are living in a colony.”
In the future global warning is a massive problem according to the time traveller, which is causing people to move to Mars.
Earth is also apparently going to be so overpopulated that people are moving to different planets because of the excessive amounts of people.

Mr Davis is believed to be 103 years oldYOUTUBE
Mr Davis is believed to be 103 years old
There will also be underwater cities, which Mr Davis claimed to have been to.
We will also finally uncover extraterrestrial life.
He said: “In America, there is evidence of things being discovered there and aliens can shapeshift and join the human race.”

SOURCE DAILY EXPRESS

Can Vladimir Putin time travel?

Images of Russian leader 'as grown man 98 years ago'

RUSSIAN president Vladimir Putin can time travel or is even an immortal vampire, according to astonishing claims. The crackpot theories emerged thanks to historic pictures which emerged of two men taken in 1920 and 1941 who look remarkably similar to slightly younger versions of Putin, now aged 65.


Putin-Time-TravelYouTube
TIME TRAVEL? Are these Vladimir Putin or historical lookalikes?
It has led conspiracy theorists to dream up a version of events linking the images to the Russian president.
One picture, taken in 1920, is of a Russian solider who does look like the leader.
One picture, taken in 1920, is of a Russian solider who does look like the leader.
A separate snap said to be of a Russian solider and taken in 1941 also looks like Putin, along with individual from 1920.
On social networks photos are circulating from 1920. and in 1941, for which some people claim they are pictures Putin
Disclose.tv revealed the theory, reporting: "On social networks are circulating pictures from 1920 and in 1941, for which some people claim that they are pictures of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

SOURCE Daily Express

Time travel SHOCK: Does this 1917 photo prove time travel is possible?


A BIZARRE photo of what appears to be a time traveller in 1917 has resurfaced online after scores of disbelievers have finally found a piece of ‘evidence’ which made them question the laws of physics.

The photo taken more than 100 years ago in Canada, portrays a group of men, women and children sitting on the side of a hill of some sorts.
But eagle-eyed observers have noticed the photo stands out for a very particular reason – what appears to be a man straight out of the 20th century.
The photo was discovered in Lester Ray Peterson’s 1974 book ‘The Great Cape Scott Story’ – a tale of the Canadian region’s history.
What has fascinated those who came across this photo is how out of place the ‘surfer man’, as some have called him, appears to be.
He is wearing a very baggy t-shirt and shorts, sporting a modern windswept haircut and is clearly at odds with everyone else around him.
Looking closer at the people around, the man to his left appears to be utterly stunned by his presence.
Further to the right a woman also appears to be pointing her hand at the supposed , leading many to speculate the man was out of place and out of his time.
In fact, it almost looks as though he jumped right into the scene as the photo was taken.
Time travel photo proof Cape Scott StoryCAPE SCOTT STORY
Time travel proof? Is this a genuine photo of a time traveller?
source of story >>> https://www.express.co.uk/news/weird/943069/Time-travel-photo-Cape-Scott-Story
YouTuber Jamie D. Grant found himself gobsmacked when he picked up the book and came across the mysterious photograph.

In a YouTube video titled ‘Time Travel proof found. Truth or Illusion?’, he says: “Notice the group, their clothes, their hats. Even how they sit poised for a photo. “Now look closer. His head uncovered, his hair, his shorts. The man on the left stares in disbelief. “Has a mysterious traveller proved the impossible and journey through time? What do you think?”

The ‘surfer man’ has joined the ranks of the so-called ‘time travelling hipster’ who appeared in a 1940s photograph with a fashion sense seemingly decades ahead of those around him.
But as some have pointed out, ‘surfer man’ may appear to stick out like a sore thumb from the rest of the crowd, but his clothing could have very well been in vogue.
One person commenting on the book on GoodReads.com, referenced a Post Gazette article, saying: “In the comments to the article, someone mentioned that t-shirts were around then and that they made it into the common lexicon soon after that date – it appeared in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary in the 1920s.
“This Article says they were worn by US Navy sailors as early as 1913.
The expert said: “Time travel into the past, which is what people usually mean by time travel, is a much more uncertain proposition.
“There are many solutions to Einstein's equations of General Relativity that allow a person to follow a timeline that would result in her (or him) encountering herself – or her grandmother – at an earlier time.
“The problem is deciding whether these solutions represent situations that could occur in the real universe, or whether they are mere mathematical oddities incompatible with known physics.”
The professor underlined that no experiment or observation in the universe has ever indicated such time travel occurs.

Bloke exposes 'time travel technology' with machine he made at HOME

 -----------------

The bloke, known only as David, says he previously travelled through time after giving up everything to study his passion.
He revealed in an interview with Apex TV how his passion as a child drove him to study the physics behind the possibility.
Then after eight years of experiments, he finally met a man named Jack Cousteau in France who could help him.
According to David, the man had a time machine that ran on electricity and water.
The pair reportedly used the machine in 1928 to travel to both the future and the past.
And now, almost a century later, David is revealing the machine they used, after mimicking the design himself.
The video shows the different parts – including a remote control, laptop screen and keyboard. 
The bloke claims it will allow him to travel to the 38th century. 
The clip was shot and uploaded to YouTube channel Apex TV after they travelled to Slovenia to interview the man.

Problem of future contingents

Future contingent propositions (or simply, future contingents) are statements about states of affairs in the future that are contingent: neither necessarily true nor necessarily false.

Aristotle: if a sea-battle will not be fought tomorrow, then it was also true yesterday that it will not be fought. But all past truths are necessary truths. Therefore, it is not possible that the battle will be fought

In general, if something will not be the case, it is not possible for it to be the case.

----------------


Aristotle solved the problem by asserting that the principle of bivalence found its exception in this paradox of the sea battles: in this specific case, what is impossible is that both alternatives can be possible at the same time: either there will be a battle, or there won't. Both options can't be simultaneously taken. Today, they are neither true nor false; but if one is true, then the other becomes false. According to Aristotle, it is impossible to say today if the proposition is correct: we must wait for the contingent realisation (or not) of the battle, logic realises itself afterwards:
One of the two propositions in such instances must be true and the other false, but we cannot say determinately that this or that is false, but must leave the alternative undecided. One may indeed be more likely to be true than the other, but it cannot be either actually true or actually false. It is therefore plain that it is not necessary that of an affirmation and a denial, one should be true and the other false. For in the case of that which exists potentially, but not actually, the rule which applies to that which exists actually does not hold good.
So either an event can or can't happen in the future but they both can't happen at the same time. Obviously that is logical. Which then moves me to a point of my own belief. That all events will or will not happen. Everything in life is 50/50 (If I go to purchase a lottery ticket then fundamentally I have a 50/50 chance of winning) It will either happen or it won't.

Balance of probabilities and odds of the numbers I select coming out can also be calculated, but when you get down to the brass tacks it is purely I will or won't win the lottery. Things you have to do though are to at least buy a lottery ticket. It is no good to say I hope for a windfall but then not put yourself into a position to have a gain.

In the case of time travel, and the case of the battle at sea. It would be possible to have two separate time lines in which on one time line no sea battle took place, and in the other time line a sea battle took place. But impossible to have both scenarios in the same time line. Basically if one event happens its opposite can not. But that is not to say it doesn't happen in another time line. Which leads onto what I was saying yesterday that the SLIDERS theory of you would go into a time line in which those other events had happened. Unlike the The Grandfather Paradox which assumes by you going back in time you have erased the reason as to why you would go back in time and thus it wouldn't happen.

Presumably it would be also interesting to look at the idea, that you may get rid of Hitler but someone else rises up in his place. Would you by killing Hitler then not stopped the Nazis but simply altered the events that they occurred and you may even fashioned an alternative ending, where as ultimately Hitler lost would killing Hitler allow someone else to take charge whom would win. (Everything seems to go back to the nazis-but it was the idea in the Grandfather Paradox of a situation which folks would want to correct)

Events in the future are not in my mind predetermined, I do feel you limit your chance of something happening by the choices you make, but as this problem of future contingents suggests. Something will or won't happen. Both things can't happen at the same time. We can only ever can be in one time line so we should make the best of what we have.

Thursday, 12 April 2018

Cut the rope time travel game


Sliders

In my previous post I gave my thoughts on the Grandfather Paradox and I concluded that the movement back in time does not stop the movement back in time happening. ( ie. Go back kill Hitler, thus stopping the Holocaust, but then not going back as the Holocaust hadn't happened to give you the need to go back in time) All it actually does in my opinion, is to create another thread of time. So the time would simply have a loop back on itself then go forward on it's new path.

Of all the TV programmes to review and look back on I think Sliders would be the most appropriate for the very conjunction with the Grandfather Paradox as it shows what could have happened "if". What if America lost it's war of independence? What if men were the "weaker sex"? What if the summer of love never ended?

The programme was one I remembered from my 20s I think X files had moved from BBC2 to SKY and then on a Wednesday evening this was introduced. I have got the first 2 series on DVD, But what of this programme and it's relevance to time travel? So you have an event occur or not, that then changes a time line. You could have it on a major scale, such as wars, disasters or political oppression. Or you could have minor self reflective moments. What if? I had asked a certain person out when I didn't? What if I had not done a certain deed which you later come to regret. Any change would re write a future time line. As your emotions would have changed, you being in a certain location. Sliding Doors the film captured this perfectly, the missing of a train went from blissful ignorance which would have led to more hurt to discovery and change of life.

Sliders gave that insight, Obviously we are in the world of TV, so we were never going to get week after week of if this had or that hadn't happened? It did go off on a tangent come series 3 onwards.

But the premise is still the same, I believe a movement back in time does not stop any particular event from happening if anything it creates another avenue for the time line. This would leave only the person who has experienced both time lines from knowing this. Which would be an interesting angle for a story, and as this itself is the premise of the blog, to look at theories and other programmes to develop my own story then this is a good learning curve.

Already there, if you are screaming "Man in the high castle" at the screen. But sliders showed the what ifs? The possibility of there being many what ifs running side by side. It is a shame they don't bring it back but played more on the what if scenario. Especially considering the turbulance of the world at the moment.

info on sliders courtesy of wiki link

Sliders is an American science fiction and fantasy television series created by Robert K. Weiss and Tracy Tormé. It was broadcast for five seasons between 1995 and 2000. The series follows a group of travellers as they use a wormhole to "slide" between different parallel universes. Tormé, Weiss, Leslie BelzbergJohn LandisDavid Peckinpah, Bill Dial and Alan Barnette served as executive producers at different times of the production. For its first two seasons it was produced in Vancouver, British Columbia. It was filmed primarily in Los Angeles, California in the last three seasons.
Since its debut on March 22, 1995, the first three seasons were broadcast by the Fox network. After being cancelled by Fox, the series moved to Sci Fi Channel for its final two seasons. The last new episode first aired on December 29, 1999 in the United Kingdom, and was broadcast on the Sci Fi Channel on February 4, 2000.

Premise

The show follows a group of people, called "Sliders", as they travel ("sliding") between different Earths in parallel universes via a vortex-like wormhole, hoping to return safely to their original Earth Prime. The vortex can only be opened after a specific but random period of time on each new universe, monitored by a countdown clock on a portable timer that they carry; failure to open the vortex in time would strand the Sliders for 29.7 years in that universe. While waiting for the timer countdown, the group learns about the differences in the alternate Earth from their own, and often become unwillingly involved in events that they must resolve before they can safely leave via the vortex. The travellers have no control over what world they end up in, but continually look for means to find Earth Prime.

Wednesday, 11 April 2018

At the age of 19 what changes for you in the UK

  • I thought it might be interesting to see what you could or could not do dependent upon your age, as time travel concerns itself about the time you are in, but what about yourself and what you would be allowed to do or not do? Also what you would be entitled too as you get older?

At the age of 19 it seems to be the first age at which you lose the entitlement to something, so instead of rushing headlong into what you can do at 19 in the UK you are no longer entitled to free full time education at school.

When you are 14 you are allowed in the UK to:

  • I thought it might be interesting to see what you could or could not do dependent upon your age, as time travel concerns itself about the time you are in, but what about yourself and what you would be allowed to do or not do? Also what you would be entitled too as you get older?


  • You can get a part time job, for a maximum of two hours on a school day, working sometime between 7.00am and 8.00am and 5.00pm and 7.00pm.
  • You can work on Sundays between 7.00am and 7.00pm, but again for no more than two hours.
  • You can work up to five hours on a Saturday between 7.00am and 7.00pm.
  • During school holidays you can work five hours a day from Monday to Saturday. But you can only work two hours a day on Sundays.
  • It’s worth checking with your Local Authority before taking on unusual work (i.e. anything that doesn’t involve shoving papers through letterboxes) to be sure it doesn’t contravene local regulations and bylaws
  • You can go into a bar and order soft drinks.
  • If convicted of a serious criminal offence (in a Youth Court), You can
    be held in secure accommodation for no more than 24 months. You could also get a fine for a maximum of £1,000.
  • Wearing a seatbelt is considered your own personal responsibility, so buckle up.

When you are 21 you are allowed in the UK to:

  • I thought it might be interesting to see what you could or could not do dependent upon your age, as time travel concerns itself about the time you are in, but what about yourself and what you would be allowed to do or not do? Also what you would be entitled too as you get older?


  • Apply to adopt a child
  • Hold an airline transport pilot's licence for an aeroplane, helicopter and gyroplane
  • Apply for a provisional licence to drive a large passenger vehicle or heavy goods vehicle  
  • Supervise a learner driver (providing you have held a full licence for the same type of vehicle for at least three years)

When you are 18 you are allowed in the UK to:

  • I thought it might be interesting to see what you could or could not do dependent upon your age, as time travel concerns itself about the time you are in, but what about yourself and what you would be allowed to do or not do? Also what you would be entitled too as you get older?


  • Vote
  • Sue or be sued
  • Open a bank account in your own name
  • Perform professionally abroad
  • Serve on a jury
  • Get a tattoo
  • Buy cigarettes and tobacco
  • Buy and drink alcohol in a bar
  • See an 18 certificate film at the cinema
  • Buy fireworks
  • Pawn items in a pawn shop
  • Leave home
  • Marry or register a civil partnership
  • Make a Will
  • Stand for election as a member of parliament
  • Carry an organ donor card
  • You cannot be made a ward of the court
  • Own land, buy a house or flat & apply for a mortgage
  • If you are adopted, you can apply to see a copy of your original birth certificate
  • Ride a motorbike above 125cc with a licence
  • Drive lorries between 3500kg and 7500kg with a trailer up to 750kg (with the appropriate licence)

When you are 17 you are allowed in the UK to:

  • I thought it might be interesting to see what you could or could not do dependent upon your age, as time travel concerns itself about the time you are in, but what about yourself and what you would be allowed to do or not do? Also what you would be entitled too as you get older?


  • Drive most vehicles and pilot a helicopter or plane
  • No longer be subject to a care order
  • Become a blood donor
  • Be interviewed by the Police without an adult present.
  • Leave your body for medical study if you die

When you are 16 you are allowed in the UK to:

  • I thought it might be interesting to see what you could or could not do dependent upon your age, as time travel concerns itself about the time you are in, but what about yourself and what you would be allowed to do or not do? Also what you would be entitled too as you get older?

  • Get married or register a civil partnership with consent
  • Drive a moped or invalid carriage
  • You can consent to sexual activity with others aged 16 and over
  • Drink wine/beer with a meal if accompanied by someone over 18
  • Get a National Insurance number
  • Join a trade union
  • Work full-time if you have left school
  • Be paid national minimum wage for 16/17 year olds
  • Join the Armed Forces with parental consent
  • Change name by deed poll
  • Leave home with or without parental consent
  • In certain circumstances you must pay for prescriptions, dental treatment and eye tests
  • Choose a GP
  • Consent to medical treatment
  • Buy premium bonds
  • Pilot a glider
  • Buy a lottery ticket
  • Register as a blood donor, but you won't be called to give blood until you're 17
  • Apply for a passport without parental consent

Friday, 6 April 2018

The Grandfather Paradox

The grandfather paradox is a paradox of time travel in which inconsistencies emerge through changing the past. The name comes from the paradox's common description: a person travels to the past and kills their own grandfather before the conception of their father or mother, which prevents the time traveller's existence.

---

Now you have to start somewhere and so why not start with talking about the main idea used as to why some folks say time travel doesn't or can't exist. Before we go to far into this, lets just say this is not singling out grandfathers. It can be any event or persons which the person going back in time interacts with.

The thought process is, that you would go back and kill (which seems a little extreme) But is mostly used for the like of Hitler. You go back kill Hitler, then WW2 and the Holocaust never happens, but the problem then says "Well if you have stopped the Nazis from rising then you wouldn't have a reason to create time travel and you wouldn't go back in time to kill Hitler"

Similarly with all other events, your action to go back would effect the future to a point that you wouldn't have invented time travel, or have a reason to go back in time. But surely that only works if life was a loop. Going back in time would suggest creating a new path, with a completely different direction. It maybe that you are the only one who knows the past, as you do re write the forthcoming history for everyone else.

So to me this is where the paradox falls down, yep killing my grand dad would then kill myself. So the terminator going back in time and killing the folks who will be fighting the rebellion does get rid of them from the future. But does it stop that path from happening? I just think that is the path that was meant to be and what it creates is the end of that particular path.

There are I feel many strings to time, and it which of those strings that we see or remember depend on which path we are on ourselves. Who is to say that if I did go back and kill someone in the past thus changing the future, that someone else didn't then go further back and change an event which prevents me from killing that person thus stopping my timestring from happening.

Also it does not have to be purely about killing someone, a simple interaction. I go back in time and talk to someone. Where previously I wasn't in that place at that time. So the person never had the conversation and then went off to do something else. There interactions cross over with other folks and then the ripple continues.

In conclusion I respect the thought behind the paradox but believe that any interaction with the past, would simply change the future and subsequent events but not stop the change itself from happening as that would be part of the path.

What would be your thought?